Celebrating 25 Years of Return of the Living Dead 3

Hollywood’s relationship with Shakespeare has been marked by odd, sometimes outrageously bizarre collaborations. None, perhaps more curious than Brian Yuzna’s exceedingly gory tale of a love-struck youth and his undead sweetheart, Return of the Living Dead 3.

Having recently helmed the ghoulish Re-Animator follow up and a feeble Silent Night, Deadly Night sequel, journeyman director Yuzna was tapped to advance the Return of the Living Dead series in late 1992. Four months, five effects crews and a few barrels of Trioxin later, Return of the Living Dead 3 was ready for release.

Foregoing the slapstick humor and whimsical tone of its predecessors, Return 3 maintains the punk nihilism and allusions to death seen in the original. Having witnessed the tragic death of his girlfriend (Julie Walker), military brat Curt Reynolds (J. Trevor Edmond) uses a top-secret chemical to bring her back to life. Problem? Her reanimated corpse seems more interested in consuming brains than loving her boyfriend.

Linnea Quigley dancing naked on a tombstone in The Return of the Living Dead (1985) was classic horror titillation. It also screamed an undeniable “fuck you” to Reagan’s America. Her character, Trash, extolled the beauty of the cemetery and the industrial park that surrounded it when she wasn’t unabashedly quizzing her friends about their preferred manner of death. She recounted dreams of men eating her alive with immense gratification. Yuzna takes this fascination with death a step further. Walker’s Julie envisions government agents utilizing experimental chemicals to revitalize dead beings while having sex with Curt. She exclaims, “I wonder if “he” felt anything” while climaxing.

Later, a zombified Julie uses a stake to penetrate the fleshy palm of her hand while grinding against a horny Curt. Her eyes glaze with euphoria; her lips quiver with ecstasy. We stare in amazed anticipation. It’s a high water mark in an otherwise banal middle act. Curt and Julie befriend a bum called Riverman (Basil Wallace) who shelters them from a trio of stereotypical hoodlums furious with Julie for taking a bite out of one of their members. It’s a “lifeless” sequence that runs way too long.

Yuzna cuts away from the make out session just before the couple gets into heavy petting. He fails to satisfy the lewd expectations of his viewers. He also misses an opportunity to one-up the thematic mingling of sex and death set forth by the original film in the series. I can think of no better way to trump Quigley’s nude striptease than to have a topless zombie humping her living boyfriend.

Yuzna exploits 90s trends to speak to the cynical disposition of his characters. The rebellious nature of Trash and friends expressed via dark clothing and brightly colored hair is heightened in Return 3 via the depiction of body piercing. Julie bores shards of twisted metal into her soft flesh and sinks bundles of gnarled wire into her skin in an effort to clear her head of negative thoughts. It is a grisly sight that echoes the body horror films of David Cronenberg and Yuzna’s own batshit gore show, Society. Julie quivers with pain and pleasure, her body limned by soft light as she rakes a jagged stone across her thigh, the sound of her muscles rupturing as she drives a steel spike through her hand is absorbed by the haunting notes of the score. The process is sexualized. You alternately cringe and gawk. This sequence is a big part of what makes the movie so strong. It speaks to the strength of Yuzna as director and Clarke’s natural beauty.

And praise for Clarke shouldn’t stop there. She simultaneously paints a portrait of teen angst while also utilizing a sensual energy to create a false façade. She depicts Julie as both erotically attractive and madly frightening. “Should I be turned on by this? Should I be freaked out? What is going on?”

Placing Julie at the center of the story is a novel approach. She is dead, but she also preserves the essential qualities of her living self. George Romero’s Night of the Living Dead shed light on man’s inhumanity against his fellow man. Return goes further in demonstrating just how cruel people can be to other humans, no matter the race. Julie says, “The living dead aren’t just animated flesh. They have an inner life.”

Like Shakespeare did with Romeo and Juliet, Yuzna creates a violent world where young people cannot trust those tasked with feeding and protecting them. His film retains the thematic issues raised in the famed play concerning love and fate. Curt and Julie must overcome giant obstacles in order to be together. In the end, they follow the path set by Romeo and Juliet, choosing death over a life apart.

I saw Return of the Living Dead 3 on VHS at fifteen. I was in love with grunge rock music and horror movie franchises. The film seemed as if it had been made with me in mind. The gothic shot of Melinda Clarke bathed in blue light with shards of glass and metal protruding from her worn jeans and baggy flannel shirt thrilled me to the core. It wasn’t until years later that I realized just how new wave the image was. Deemed trite by many critics upon its initial release, the movie actually has a lot more to offer than most films of its type. Now, twenty-five years after first gracing the silver screen, I hope audiences take the time to rediscover this underrated zombie flick.


Yuzna has not directed a film in a number of years, although he has a handful of projects in development under his Dark Arts banner. Melinda Clarke experienced a highly successful career in television, which included recurring roles in shows such as The O.C., Entourage, Gotham and The Vampire Diaries. The Return of the Living Dead series went into hibernation following part 3 but returned in 2005 with a pair of sequels subtitled Necropolis and Rave to the Grave. The movie is available on blu ray as part as Vestron Video’s collector’s series.

Ernie Rockelman

Ernie loves movies. He's not so great talking about them, but he's pretty okay writing about them. He worked as a critic for the Press of AC for a number of years. Now he teaches film to high school kids and occasionally makes movies that nobody sees.

3 thoughts on “Celebrating 25 Years of Return of the Living Dead 3

  • May 15, 2018 at 3:46 pm

    I remember seeing this film as a kid and immediately forgetting about it. However, like all well-written articles, this has now re-piqued my interest. I probably didn’t even register the Shakespeare connection and, as a youth, just gawked at the sexual imagery without appreciating the direction and performances that made the film a notch or two above exploitation. It is clear that TROTLD3 deserves another viewing.

    BTW, I like the SINCE ITS RELEASE section of this article (celebrating the past but also looking at where the film, along with its cast and crew, stand today).

    Keep it up, GeekAde! Great stuff!!

  • May 15, 2018 at 4:08 pm

    Thanks man. It is a flawed movie, but it’s got more going for it than it gets credit for. I always dug Yuzna’s early stuff (especially Society).

  • January 12, 2022 at 3:48 am

    this one haunted me like a real bad dream since around the time in life i was beginning to hide an embarrassing bulge in my baggy jeans sitting behind the “hot girls” on the bleachers at school. so it was different and i hated it at first but over the years and ive rediscovered it in a fetishist way the film makers must have intended. a departure but i think it was a fitting departure and almost “freddy’s nightmares” type of breakaway that has failed in other places but might have worked here. the memorable transformation scenes where the girl escapes her inner torment with some radical body mutilating is almost gg allin in spirit and symbolic possibly of the real life face of addiction and mental sicknesses that ive seen take a few too many real lives. i suppose its coincidence but i did catch the shakespearian stuff and was part of an amateur ensemble cast that put on a paltry romeo and juliet the same year at our high school haha. i agree it also it has a grunge aesthetic in line with the punk is dead feel of the first one. i cant deny that looking back now. i guess i took for granite in those times that everything was soaked in eddie vedders voice and kurt cobains um brain matter ha poor choice of words. the only bad thing about the re-examine im getting is that a lot of people felt it ditched the more serious themes for a cop out to cheese in the last act. perhaps just because the filmmakers got spooked into thoughts like “i cant believe were actually doing this” that many felt it left more to be explored (i figure they ran out of money). i think even with the restraint the film does seem to erm show its stuff. it left me with some bruised feelings sure. ill say any film that can make you have a nightmare is at some level a good film. it is just that i have too many nightmares dam these meds haha..


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *